People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskey
This text of 168 N.E.2d 853 (People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Foster. Judges Dye and Burke dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the order of Special Term upon the ground that the relator’s answers, superficially at least, were not false on their face but were, in fact and effect, so carefully contrived and so lacking in substance as to amount [961]*961to a refusal to answer, since the net effect of the interrogation was to leave the Commission of Investigation without any useful or material information not already known concerning the so-called Apalaehin meeting (cf. People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskey, 6 N Y 2d 390).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 N.E.2d 853, 8 N.Y.2d 959, 204 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-valenti-v-mccloskey-ny-1960.