People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskey

168 N.E.2d 853, 8 N.Y.2d 959, 204 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1089
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 8, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 168 N.E.2d 853 (People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskey, 168 N.E.2d 853, 8 N.Y.2d 959, 204 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1089 (N.Y. 1960).

Opinion

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Foster. Judges Dye and Burke dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the order of Special Term upon the ground that the relator’s answers, superficially at least, were not false on their face but were, in fact and effect, so carefully contrived and so lacking in substance as to amount [961]*961to a refusal to answer, since the net effect of the interrogation was to leave the Commission of Investigation without any useful or material information not already known concerning the so-called Apalaehin meeting (cf. People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskey, 6 N Y 2d 390).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zimmerman v. Board of Education of City of Newark
183 A.2d 25 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1962)
United States v. Bufalino
285 F.2d 408 (Second Circuit, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 N.E.2d 853, 8 N.Y.2d 959, 204 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-valenti-v-mccloskey-ny-1960.