People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskey

168 N.E.2d 853, 8 N.Y.2d 959, 204 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1089
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 8, 1960·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Foster. Judges Dye and Burke dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the order of Special Term upon the ground that the relator’s answers, superficially at least, were not false on their face but were, in fact and effect, so carefully contrived and so lacking in substance as to amount [961]*961to a refusal to answer, since the net effect of the interrogation was to leave the Commission of Investigation without any useful or material information not already known concerning the so-called Apalaehin meeting (cf. People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskey, 6 N Y 2d 390).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskey, 168 N.E.2d 853, 8 N.Y.2d 959, 204 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1089 (N.Y. 1960).

168 N.E.2d 853 (People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zimmerman v. Board of Education of City of Newark
183 A.2d 25 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1962)
United States v. Bufalino
285 F.2d 408 (Second Circuit, 1960)