People ex rel. Vail v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Vail v. Murphy

245 A.D. 901

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D. 901 (People ex rel. Vail v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Vail v. Murphy, 245 A.D. 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order of County Court of Clinton county dismissing writ of certiorari. The defendant was indicted for a felony by the Westchester grand jury, sitting with the Supreme Court, and the indictment transferred to the County Court for trial. The defendant complains that the statute, in so far as it affects Westchester county, provides for drawing of only four grand juries for the Supreme Court in that county, and that five were in fact drawn in the year in which he was indicted, the last of the five being convened in connection with the October term, and it was at this October term that he was indicted, the fifth grand jury for that year. Order unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order of County Court of Clinton county dismissing writ of certiorari. The defendant was indicted for a felony by the Westchester grand jury, sitting with the Supreme Court, and the indictment transferred to the County Court for trial. The defendant complains that the statute, in so far as it affects Westchester county, provides for drawing of only four grand juries for the Supreme Court in that county, and that five were in fact drawn in the year in which he was indicted, the last of the five being convened in connection with the October term, and it was at this October term that he was indicted, the fifth grand jury for that year. Order unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-vail-v-murphy-nyappdiv-1935.