People ex rel. Tucker v. Fay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Tucker v. Fay

11 A.D.2d 956, 205 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8080

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 956 (People ex rel. Tucker v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Tucker v. Fay, 11 A.D.2d 956, 205 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8080 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Application for leave to appeal as a poor person from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dismissing a writ of habeas corpus, denied, without prejudice to renewal on proper papers. Appellant, who was imprisoned after conviction of a felony, asserts that he is being unlawfully detained after the expiration of the term of imprisonment prescribed by the judgment against him. The petition is not supported by the certificate required by rule 35 of the Rules of Civil Practice, nor does the petition state facts sufficient to establish that the appeal has arguable merit. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application for leave to appeal as a poor person from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dismissing a writ of habeas corpus, denied, without prejudice to renewal on proper papers. Appellant, who was imprisoned after conviction of a felony, asserts that he is being unlawfully detained after the expiration of the term of imprisonment prescribed by the judgment against him. The petition is not supported by the certificate required by rule 35 of the Rules of Civil Practice, nor does the petition state facts sufficient to establish that the appeal has arguable merit. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 956, 205 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-tucker-v-fay-nyappdiv-1960.