People ex rel. Torres v. Warden, Anna M. Kross Ctr.

2021 NY Slip Op 06935, 200 A.D.3d 829, 155 N.Y.S.3d 336
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 13, 2021
Docket2021-08801
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 06935 (People ex rel. Torres v. Warden, Anna M. Kross Ctr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Torres v. Warden, Anna M. Kross Ctr., 2021 NY Slip Op 06935, 200 A.D.3d 829, 155 N.Y.S.3d 336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People ex rel. Torres v Warden, Anna M. Kross Ctr. (2021 NY Slip Op 06935)
People ex rel. Torres v Warden, Anna M. Kross Ctr.
2021 NY Slip Op 06935
Decided on December 13, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 13, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, J.P.
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

2021-08801

[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Richard Torres, on behalf of Dovontay Jackson, petitioner,

v

Warden, Anna M. Kross Center, et al., respondent.


Richard Torres, Brooklyn, NY, petitioner pro se.

Georgia M. Pestana, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Melanie T. West and Kevin Osowski of counsel), for respondent.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Nikita Mehta of counsel), nonparty pro se.



DECISION & JUDGMENT

Writ of habeas corpus, inter alia, in the nature of an application to release Dovontay Jackson upon his own recognizance or, in the alternative, in effect, to set reasonable bail upon Kings County Indictment No. 72592/2021.

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230; People ex rel. Litman v Spano, 197 AD3d 1211).

The petitioner's remaining contention is without merit.

MALTESE, J.P., DUFFY, IANNACCI and FORD, JJ., concur.

ENTER: Maria T. Fasulo Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Litma v. Spano
2021 NY Slip Op 05015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger
255 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson
397 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 06935, 200 A.D.3d 829, 155 N.Y.S.3d 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-torres-v-warden-anna-m-kross-ctr-nyappdiv-2021.