People ex rel. Torres v. Morrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Torres v. Morrow

30 A.D.2d 986, 294 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3167

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 986 (People ex rel. Torres v. Morrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Torres v. Morrow, 30 A.D.2d 986, 294 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Sullivan County, entered February 2, 1968, which dismissed a writ of habeas corpus. The trial court found that relator is “ a narcotic addict within the meaning of section 201 of the Mental Hygiene Law and should not be discharged at this time ” and we find no reason to disturb this factual determination. As to relator’s other contentions, substantially the same arguments raised here were rejected by this court in People ex rel. Gordon v. Murphy (30 A D 2d 358). (See, also, People ex rel. Rivera v. Murphy, 30 A D 2d 900.) Any additional claims raised we find insubstantial. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Sullivan County, entered February 2, 1968, which dismissed a writ of habeas corpus. The trial court found that relator is “ a narcotic addict within the meaning of section 201 of the Mental Hygiene Law and should not be discharged at this time ” and we find no reason to disturb this factual determination. As to relator’s other contentions, substantially the same arguments raised here were rejected by this court in People ex rel. Gordon v. Murphy (30 A D 2d 358). (See, also, People ex rel. Rivera v. Murphy, 30 A D 2d 900.) Any additional claims raised we find insubstantial. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 986, 294 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-torres-v-morrow-nyappdiv-1968.