People ex rel. Thorne v. Sutton
This text of 189 A.D. 919 (People ex rel. Thorne v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that while the petition is insufficient to set up the claim of inequality (See People ex rel. O’ Neil v. Purdy, 188 App. Div. 485; People ex rel. Coney Island Jockey Club v. Purdy, 152 id. 175; affd., 207 N. Y. 695), it is sufficient to set up a claim of overvaluation. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
189 A.D. 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-thorne-v-sutton-nyappdiv-1919.