People ex rel. Thompson v. Mancusi

33 A.D.2d 643, 305 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3065
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 23, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 A.D.2d 643 (People ex rel. Thompson v. Mancusi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Thompson v. Mancusi, 33 A.D.2d 643, 305 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with County Court that the preferred method of litigating the issue here presented — as to whether or not appellant had counsel at the time of his prior conviction in a foreign State' — is by motion to resentenee (cf. People v. Jones, 17 N Y 2d 404; People v. Cornish, 21 A D 2d 280, 283). No persuasive reason is advanced as to the necessity of resorting to habeas corpus. Presumably the pertinent records relating to the New Hampshire conviction are in the county (Chenango) where sentencing took place. Orderly procedure dictates that relief should be there sought. (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming County Court dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present — Marsh, J. P., Gabrielli, Moule, Bastow and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Cordero v. Metz
58 A.D.2d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 A.D.2d 643, 305 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-thompson-v-mancusi-nyappdiv-1969.