People ex rel. Thompson v. Mancusi
This text of 33 A.D.2d 643 (People ex rel. Thompson v. Mancusi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with County Court that the preferred method of litigating the issue here presented — as to whether or not appellant had counsel at the time of his prior conviction in a foreign State' — is by motion to resentenee (cf. People v. Jones, 17 N Y 2d 404; People v. Cornish, 21 A D 2d 280, 283). No persuasive reason is advanced as to the necessity of resorting to habeas corpus. Presumably the pertinent records relating to the New Hampshire conviction are in the county (Chenango) where sentencing took place. Orderly procedure dictates that relief should be there sought. (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming County Court dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present — Marsh, J. P., Gabrielli, Moule, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 A.D.2d 643, 305 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-thompson-v-mancusi-nyappdiv-1969.