People ex rel. Thompson v. Mancusi

33 A.D.2d 643, 305 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3065
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 23, 1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with County Court that the preferred method of litigating the issue here presented — as to whether or not appellant had counsel at the time of his prior conviction in a foreign State' — is by motion to resentenee (cf. People v. Jones, 17 N Y 2d 404; People v. Cornish, 21 A D 2d 280, 283). No persuasive reason is advanced as to the necessity of resorting to habeas corpus. Presumably the pertinent records relating to the New Hampshire conviction are in the county (Chenango) where sentencing took place. Orderly procedure dictates that relief should be there sought. (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming County Court dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present — Marsh, J. P., Gabrielli, Moule, Bastow and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Thompson v. Mancusi, 33 A.D.2d 643, 305 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

33 A.D.2d 643 (People ex rel. Thompson v. Mancusi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Cordero v. Metz
58 A.D.2d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)