People ex rel. Teishman v. Riordan

36 A.D.3d 504, 826 N.Y.S.2d 569

This text of 36 A.D.3d 504 (People ex rel. Teishman v. Riordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Teishman v. Riordan, 36 A.D.3d 504, 826 N.Y.S.2d 569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Appeal from judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered September 30, 2005, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Appellant’s claims of unlawful detention before trial and excessive bail are moot in light of his subsequent conviction and incarceration after trial. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Saunders
52 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 A.D.3d 504, 826 N.Y.S.2d 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-teishman-v-riordan-nyappdiv-2007.