People ex rel. Teel v. Sweeting

2 Johns. 184
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1807·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court has a discretion to grant motions of this kind, or to refuse them., if no sufficient reasons appear for'allowing this mode of proceeding. The office of Sweeting, the acting, supervisor, will expire in April, and .before the remedy now prayed for can have any effect. — There must he an issue joined, and a trial, which could not take place before the next election, so that it would be impossible to restore Teel to his office. It would,, therefore, be idle and useless to grant the motion. If the justices have been guilty of any mis.demean- or, the party aggrieved must seek a different remedy.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Teel v. Sweeting, 2 Johns. 184 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1807).

2 Johns. 184 (People ex rel. Teel v. Sweeting) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kimball v. New England Roller Grate Co.
45 A. 253 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1898)
Loven v. People
46 Ill. App. 306 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1892)
People ex rel. Dafoe v. Harshaw
26 N.W. 879 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1886)
Clark v. Crane
57 Cal. 629 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
Lacoste v. Duffy
49 Tex. 767 (Texas Supreme Court, 1878)
Dane v. Derby
54 Me. 95 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1866)
People ex rel. Speed v. Hartwell
12 Mich. 508 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1864)
People ex rel. Peabody v. Attorney General
3 Abb. Pr. 131 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)
State ex rel. Casterline v. Gummersall
24 N.J.L. 529 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1854)
People ex rel. Israel v. Tibbets
4 Cow. 358 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
People v. Richardson
4 Cow. 97 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
People ex rel. Van Voast v. Van Slyck
4 Cow. 297 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)