People ex rel. Taylor v. Richardson
181 A.D.2d 1069, 582 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4697
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 1992·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Habeas corpus relief is not available to petitioner because, even if he were to prevail on the motion, he is entitled only to a new hearing, not immediate release (see, People ex rel. Maiello v New York State Bd. of Parole, 101 AD2d 569, affd 65 NY2d 145). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J. — Habeas Corpus.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Fallon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Taylor v. Richardson, 181 A.D.2d 1069, 582 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
181 A.D.2d 1069 (People ex rel. Taylor v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Hickman v. Russi
257 A.D.2d 457 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)