People ex rel. Taylor v. Meloni

96 A.D.2d 1149, 468 N.Y.S.2d 94, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19845
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 1983·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed, petition dismissed and bail reinstated in the amount of $500,000. Memorandum: The judgment is reversed and bail is reinstated in the amount of $500,000. When reviewing a bail determination, the habeas corpus court is limited to the record that was before the nisi prius court, and evidence of a change in circumstances which may affect a bail determination must be submitted to the bail-setting court for reconsideration. The decision of that court on the renewal of the bail application would then be subject to review by writ of habeas corpus (People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230). The habeas corpus court erred by considering evidence of the bail status of a codefendant. “To receive new evidence would be both to frustrate the integrity of the review function and to undertake a de novo bail determination. This the habeas corpus court may not do” (People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, supra, p 233). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J. — habeas corpus.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Doerr, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ. (Order entered Sept. 15, 1983.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Taylor v. Meloni, 96 A.D.2d 1149, 468 N.Y.S.2d 94, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19845 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

96 A.D.2d 1149 (People ex rel. Taylor v. Meloni) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Steinagle v. Howard
204 A.D.3d 1491 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Lora
51 Misc. 3d 493 (New York County Courts, 2015)
People ex rel. Ryan v. Infante
108 A.D.2d 987 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)