People ex rel. Taylor v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Taylor v. Harris

180 A.D.2d 989, 580 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2889

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 A.D.2d 989 (People ex rel. Taylor v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Taylor v. Harris, 180 A.D.2d 989, 580 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cobb, J.), entered July 10, 1991 in Greene County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, after a hearing.

Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition due to petitioner’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Even if petitioner’s claim is accepted that habeas corpus is the appropriate remedy, the issue he raises could have been raised on administrative appeal (see, 9 NYCRR 8006.3; People ex rel. Gray v New York State Bd. of Parole, 174 AD2d 874, lv denied 78 NY2d 860; Matter of Milburn v New York State Div. of Parole, 173 AD2d 1016; Matter of Trimaldi v Superintendent of Washington Correctional Facility, 169 AD2d 960). The court’s decision must therefore be affirmed.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cobb, J.), entered July 10, 1991 in Greene County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, after a hearing.

Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition due to petitioner’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Even if petitioner’s claim is accepted that habeas corpus is the appropriate remedy, the issue he raises could have been raised on administrative appeal (see, 9 NYCRR 8006.3; People ex rel. Gray v New York State Bd. of Parole, 174 AD2d 874, lv denied 78 NY2d 860; Matter of Milburn v New York State Div. of Parole, 173 AD2d 1016; Matter of Trimaldi v Superintendent of Washington Correctional Facility, 169 AD2d 960). The court’s decision must therefore be affirmed.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 A.D.2d 989, 580 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-taylor-v-harris-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack