People ex rel. Sweeney v. Smith

50 A.D.2d 722, 375 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12604
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 6, 1975·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously reversed and a new parole revocation hearing granted. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing a writ of habeas corpus in which he sought to challenge the validity of his parole revocation. Petitioner was charged with a number of parole violations, some of which he admitted and others which he denied. At the parole board hearing, petitioner’s parole was revoked and he was remanded to the Attica Correctional Facility. Due process requires that prior to parole revocation a parolee be given a hearing before a "neutral and detached” board (Morrissey v Brewer, 408 US 471). The presence on the board of the former sheriff who originally arrested petitioner and who, it appears without contradiction, was a party to civil litigation instituted by petitioner, effectively destroyed that neutrality so that due process mandates another hearing. We do not pass on the merits of whether the parole violations were sufficient to commit petitioner. (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming County Court dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Sweeney v. Smith, 50 A.D.2d 722, 375 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12604 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

50 A.D.2d 722 (People ex rel. Sweeney v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Pyclik v. Smith
81 A.D.2d 1016 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)