People ex rel. Sweeney v. Fallon
This text of 156 A.D. 895 (People ex rel. Sweeney v. Fallon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court does not care to hear the district attorney, as the court has no doubt as .to the absolute discretion of the trial court to order the prisoners into custody at any time after their appearance for trial; that both sections 422 and 553 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be read together; that they are not inconsistent, and they do not give a person indicted for a misdemeanor an absolute right to remain at large on bail after his trial has commenced. The writ will, therefore, be dismissed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin and Scott, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 A.D. 895, 29 N.Y. Crim. 407, 141 N.Y.S. 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-sweeney-v-fallon-nyappdiv-1913.