People ex rel. Sutliff v. Easton

2 Wend. 297
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1829·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Savage, C. J.

The relator is entitled to his deed. Wiley’s judgment, by the sale under his execution at a sum beyond the amount thereof, became satisfied, pun he was no longer a judgment creditor, having a Men upon the land sold at the previous sale, under which the relator claims. Had the premises been purchased by a stranger instead of the plaintiff in the execution, such would have been the effect, and whether he or another became the purchaser, cannot alter the rights of the relator. A sale of land under an execution, extinguishes the lien of the judgment on the land sold. (8 John’s R. 334. See also 4 Cowen, 417, and 7 Cowen, 21.) Let a mandamus issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Sutliff v. Easton, 2 Wend. 297 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

2 Wend. 297 (People ex rel. Sutliff v. Easton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McMillan v. Richards
9 Cal. 365 (California Supreme Court, 1858)
Wood v. Colvin
5 Hill & Den. 228 (New York Supreme Court, 1843)
Koning v. Bayard
14 F. Cas. 843 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1829)