People ex rel. Sullivan v. Hake
This text of 81 Ill. 540 (People ex rel. Sullivan v. Hake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appears by the record in this case that the respondent is enjoined in another proceeding from doing precisely the same thing that it is here sought to compel him to do by mandarmis, and that such proceeding is now pending for hearing at the next term in the southern division. The adjudication in that case will settle the question attempted to he raised in this, Rnd, on the principle announced in People ex rel. etc. v. Warfield, 20 Ill. 159, and People ex rel. v. Wiant, 48 id. 263, memdamus will not he awarded.
Mandamus refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 Ill. 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-sullivan-v-hake-ill-1876.