People ex rel. Stuart v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Stuart v. King

2 A.D.2d 934, 156 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3955

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 9, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 934 (People ex rel. Stuart v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Stuart v. King, 2 A.D.2d 934, 156 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Saratoga County denying the relator’s petition for a writ of error in the nature of coram nobis. The appellant contended that the attorney who appeared for him at the time the appellant pleaded guilty had not been retained by him or on his behalf. However, the minutes of the proceedings show that the defendant stated to the court that the attorney in question represented him and that, in the defendant’s presence, the attorney spoke on the defendant’s behalf without any protest or objection of any kind. Order unanimously affirmed. Present — Bergan, J. P., Coon, Halpern, Zeller and Gibson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Saratoga County denying the relator’s petition for a writ of error in the nature of coram nobis. The appellant contended that the attorney who appeared for him at the time the appellant pleaded guilty had not been retained by him or on his behalf. However, the minutes of the proceedings show that the defendant stated to the court that the attorney in question represented him and that, in the defendant’s presence, the attorney spoke on the defendant’s behalf without any protest or objection of any kind. Order unanimously affirmed. Present — Bergan, J. P., Coon, Halpern, Zeller and Gibson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 934, 156 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-stuart-v-king-nyappdiv-1956.