People ex rel. Stromberg v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Stromberg v. Smith

50 A.D.2d 718, 375 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12595

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 718 (People ex rel. Stromberg v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Stromberg v. Smith, 50 A.D.2d 718, 375 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12595 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The sentence of the court was "that he be committed to the custody of the State Department of Corrections and shall serve in State prison for a term of not less than eight years, four months, nor more than 25 years”. The relator was in fact committed to the custody of the State Department of Corrections and not to "State prison” and therefore, the correctional authorities properly complied with both the sentence of the court and the Penal Law. The surplus language had no harmful effect. (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming County Court denying application for a writ of habeas corpus.) Present— Marsh, P. J., Moule, Goldman, Del Vecchio and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The sentence of the court was "that he be committed to the custody of the State Department of Corrections and shall serve in State prison for a term of not less than eight years, four months, nor more than 25 years”. The relator was in fact committed to the custody of the State Department of Corrections and not to "State prison” and therefore, the correctional authorities properly complied with both the sentence of the court and the Penal Law. The surplus language had no harmful effect. (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming County Court denying application for a writ of habeas corpus.) Present— Marsh, P. J., Moule, Goldman, Del Vecchio and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 718, 375 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-stromberg-v-smith-nyappdiv-1975.