People ex rel. Straus v. Purdy

160 A.D. 871, 144 N.Y.S. 921
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1913·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The issue presented was whether or not the fair market value of the land, unimproved, was less than $4,000,000, the amount at which it was assessed. It appearing that the fair market value was in excess of that sum, the order appealed from should be affirmed. But the fourth finding should be modified because it was unnecessary to determine the exact value of the land unimproved, in excess of the amount at which it had been assessed. The fourth finding of fact is, therefore, modified so as to read: “That on the second Monday of January, 1910, the said property unimproved was of a market value in excess of $4,000,000.” As so modified the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with costs to respondent. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Straus v. Purdy, 160 A.D. 871, 144 N.Y.S. 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

160 A.D. 871 (People ex rel. Straus v. Purdy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Mexican Telegraph Co. v. State Tax Commission
219 A.D. 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)