People ex rel. Stork v. Judge of the Superior Court
2 N.W. 180, 41 Mich. 5, 1 McGrath 859, 41 McGrath 5, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 768
Opinion
An order granting a new trial cannot finally dispose of any rights, and is usually, at least, discretionary; and the Supreme Court will not review it simply because we would not have granted it, even though, as in this case, the party seems to have lost by negligence any very good claim to a new trial.
Mandamus denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Stork v. Judge of the Superior Court, 2 N.W. 180, 41 Mich. 5, 1 McGrath 859, 41 McGrath 5, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 768 (Mich. 1879).
2 N.W. 180 (People ex rel. Stork v. Judge of the Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jaeger v. Mitchell
269 N.W. 235 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1936)
Hicks v. Stillwater County
274 P. 296 (Montana Supreme Court, 1929)
Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Newton
89 Mich. 549 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1891)
Wood v. Strother
18 P. 766 (California Supreme Court, 1888)