People ex rel. Stinger v. Kingsbury

100 Ill. 509, 1881 Ill. LEXIS 135
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 27, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 Ill. 509 (People ex rel. Stinger v. Kingsbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Stinger v. Kingsbury, 100 Ill. 509, 1881 Ill. LEXIS 135 (Ill. 1881).

Opinions

Per Curiam :

This is an application for a writ of mandamus, to compel the county clerk of Marshall county to call a special election to choose a county treasurer, to hold for the unexpired part of the term to which one William E. Thompson was elected in November, 1879. Thompson entered upon the duties thereof on the first Monday of December, 1879, and continued to hold the office until the 27th day of February, 1881, on which latter day he died, whereby that office then became vacant.

The clerk refuses to call such election, insisting that the unexpired. part of the term is less than one yeár. If this were so it would be the duty of the board of supervisor's to fill the office by appointment. The record shows that the board did, in fact, on the second day of March, 1881, appoint one James Law county treasurer, who qualified, and entered upon the duties of the office. The relator insists this appointment, under the facts, was unlawful and void, and should be treated as a nullity, and that the term of county treasurer has been extended by law one year, and until the first Monday of December, 1882. We have at this term, in the ease of The People ex rel. v. Board of Supervisor's of LaSalle County,(ante, p. 495,)held that no general election for county treasurers is authorized by law to be held before November, 1882, and that under the constitution and law now in force, the present incumbents are entitled to hold their respective offices until the first Monday of December, 1882. Accepting that decision as settling that question, it follows that the term for county treasurers has been extended until December, 1882, and that the unexpired part of the term in this case is in law more than a year, hence the appointment by the board was not lawful, and the respondent ought to proceed at once to call a special election to fill the vacancy.

The mandamus is therefore allowed.

Mandamus allowed:

Mr. Justice Scott :

I can not concur in this decision, and for an expression of my views reference is made to my separate opinion in The People v. Board of Supervisors of LaSalle County, decided at the present term.

Mr. Justice Walker:

I hold there should be a general election in November, 1881, in this as in other cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Miller v. Hotz
158 N.E. 743 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 Ill. 509, 1881 Ill. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-stinger-v-kingsbury-ill-1881.