People Ex Rel. Sternberger v. . Sternberger

47 N.E. 918, 153 N.Y. 684, 7 E.H. Smith 684, 1897 N.Y. LEXIS 819
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 5, 1897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is dismissed upon the following grounds:

1. The order of the Appellate Division is discretionary and we have no power to review it.

2. This discretion was exercised after the court below had unanimously decided, on considering the facts, that it was for the benefit and welfare of the infants that they be confided, until the further order of the court, to the care and custody of their mother.

We must assume that the evidence was sufficient to warrant the conclusion reached by the Appellate Division.

The appeal should be dismissed, with costs.

All concur, except Gray, J., absent.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People Ex Rel. Sternberger v. . Sternberger, 47 N.E. 918, 153 N.Y. 684, 7 E.H. Smith 684, 1897 N.Y. LEXIS 819 (N.Y. 1897).

47 N.E. 918 (People Ex Rel. Sternberger v. . Sternberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Osterhoudt v. . Osterhoudt
61 N.E. 285 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)