People ex rel. Stephens v. Smith

64 A.D.2d 1008, 409 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13005
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 15, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 64 A.D.2d 1008 (People ex rel. Stephens v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Stephens v. Smith, 64 A.D.2d 1008, 409 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13005 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On [1009]*1009this appeal from a dismissal of his writ of habeas corpus without a hearing, relator asserts that the court should have considered the merits of his contention that he was deprived of his right to appear before the Grand Jury under CPL 190.50 (subd 5, par [a]). A writ of habeas corpus can be utilized to review neither claimed errors already passed on in an earlier appeal nor issues which could have been raised on appeal but were not (e.g., People ex rel. Knox v Smith, 60 AD2d 789). Inasmuch as the issue raised by relator could have been adequately reviewed on the appeal from his judgment of conviction (see Matter of Be Con tie v Jefferson County Ct., 40 ÁD2d 619, 620), the writ was properly dismissed. (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming County Court—habeas corpus.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Dillon, Hancock, Jr., and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Barnes v. Smith
70 A.D.2d 764 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 A.D.2d 1008, 409 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-stephens-v-smith-nyappdiv-1978.