People ex rel. Spindel v. La Vallee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Spindel v. La Vallee

33 A.D.2d 968, 306 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5675

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1970

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 A.D.2d 968 (People ex rel. Spindel v. La Vallee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Spindel v. La Vallee, 33 A.D.2d 968, 306 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Clinton County, dismissing appellant’s writ of habeas corpus after a hearing. An appeal, which the parties assert will be heard in February, 1970, is .presently pending in the Appellate Division, First Department, from the judgment of conviction which appellant attacks in the instant proceeding. In that appeal appellant may raise the identical grounds he asserts here, and we find no reason of practicality or necessity asserted to justify review of the matters raised by habeas corpus while such an appeal is pending (People ex rel. Keitt v. MeMamm, 18 N Y 2d 257, 262; People ex rel. Blyden v. Denno, 28 A D 2d 683). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Clinton County, dismissing appellant’s writ of habeas corpus after a hearing. An appeal, which the parties assert will be heard in February, 1970, is .presently pending in the Appellate Division, First Department, from the judgment of conviction which appellant attacks in the instant proceeding. In that appeal appellant may raise the identical grounds he asserts here, and we find no reason of practicality or necessity asserted to justify review of the matters raised by habeas corpus while such an appeal is pending (People ex rel. Keitt v. MeMamm, 18 N Y 2d 257, 262; People ex rel. Blyden v. Denno, 28 A D 2d 683). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 968, 306 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-spindel-v-la-vallee-nyappdiv-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack