People Ex Rel. Spang v. . Carey
111 N.E. 1092, 217 N.Y. 627, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1380
This text of 111 N.E. 1092 (People Ex Rel. Spang v. . Carey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People Ex Rel. Spang v. . Carey, 111 N.E. 1092, 217 N.Y. 627, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1380 (N.Y. 1916).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Sea-bury and Pound, JJ. Not voting: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Multer v. State
178 Misc. 360 (New York State Court of Claims, 1942)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 N.E. 1092, 217 N.Y. 627, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-spang-v-carey-ny-1916.