People ex rel. Spaet v. Warden of City Prison
This text of 195 A.D. 908 (People ex rel. Spaet v. Warden of City Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Relator’s conviction by the city magistrate, holding the Domestic Relations Court, was by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction. As to the relator its judgment is final until reversed on appeal. The writ of habeas corpus does not bring up for review the court’s rulings as to the legal effect of the annulment decree entered by the Nevada court on the wife’s default. (People ex rel. Farrington v. Mensching, 187 N. Y. 27; People ex rel. Price v. Hayes, 151 App. Div. 561.) The order of the justice at Special Term dismissing the writ is, therefore, affirmed. Jenks, P. J., Rich, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 A.D. 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-spaet-v-warden-of-city-prison-nyappdiv-1921.