People ex rel. Spaet v. Warden of City Prison

195 A.D. 908

Opinion

Relator’s conviction by the city magistrate, holding the Domestic Relations Court, was by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction. As to the relator its judgment is final until reversed on appeal. The writ of habeas corpus does not bring up for review the court’s rulings as to the legal effect of the annulment decree entered by the Nevada court on the wife’s default. (People ex rel. Farrington v. Mensching, 187 N. Y. 27; People ex rel. Price v. Hayes, 151 App. Div. 561.) The order of the justice at Special Term dismissing the writ is, therefore, affirmed. Jenks, P. J., Rich, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Spaet v. Warden of City Prison, 195 A.D. 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

195 A.D. 908 (People ex rel. Spaet v. Warden of City Prison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People Ex Rel. Farrington v. . Mensching
79 N.E. 884 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
People ex rel. Price v. Hayes
151 A.D. 561 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)