People ex rel. Soto v. Vincent

43 A.D.2d 948, 351 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6040

This text of 43 A.D.2d 948 (People ex rel. Soto v. Vincent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Soto v. Vincent, 43 A.D.2d 948, 351 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6040 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated January 17, 1974 and made upon a decision dated March 21, 1972, which dismissed the writ. The notice of appeal, dated April 3, 1972, is hereby amended to show that the date of the judgment is January 17, 1974; and the notice of appeal has been treated as valid (CPLR 5520, subd. [c]). Appeal dismissed, without costs. Relator has been unconditionally discharged (People ex rel. Wilder v. Marleley, 26 N Y 2d 648). Gulotta, P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 A.D.2d 948, 351 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-soto-v-vincent-nyappdiv-1974.