People ex rel. Solomon v. Fitzpatrick

288 A.D.2d 106, 733 N.Y.S.2d 339, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11090
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 20, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 288 A.D.2d 106 (People ex rel. Solomon v. Fitzpatrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Solomon v. Fitzpatrick, 288 A.D.2d 106, 733 N.Y.S.2d 339, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11090 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Esposito, J.), entered on or about July 31, 2001, granting petitioner law guardian’s application for a writ of habeas corpus ordering the release of George T., a pre-trial detainee in a juvenile delinquency proceeding in Bronx Family Court, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the writ denied and the proceeding dismissed. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 3, 2001, denying the presentment agency’s motion to renew and reargue, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

Petitioner seeks to challenge George T.’s pre-trial detention as violating his right to a speedy fact-finding hearing under Family Court Act § 340.1. However, in view of the delays caused by his own pre-trial motion practice, the necessity of concluding the ongoing Mapp/Dunaway hearing before starting the fact-finding hearing, and the good cause upon which adjournments were predicated, we conclude that his statutory rights were not violated (see, Matter of Willie E., 88 NY2d 205, 209-210; Matter of Robert S., 259 AD2d 339) and this record provides no basis for habeas corpus relief. Concur — Tom, J. P., Mazzarelli, Wallach, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of George T.
786 N.E.2d 2 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
In re George T.
290 A.D.2d 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 A.D.2d 106, 733 N.Y.S.2d 339, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-solomon-v-fitzpatrick-nyappdiv-2001.