People ex rel. Solages v. Spota
119 A.D.3d 880, 989 N.Y.S.2d 355
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 23, 2014·No. 2014-06544·Published
Opinion
Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to reduce bail upon Suffolk County indictment No. 1435D-14.
Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The determination of the County Court, Suffolk County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230 [1979]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Solages v. Spota, 119 A.D.3d 880, 989 N.Y.S.2d 355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
119 A.D.3d 880 (People ex rel. Solages v. Spota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger
255 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson
397 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)