People ex rel. Smith v. Ternullo

100 A.D.2d 525, 472 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17495
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 5, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 100 A.D.2d 525 (People ex rel. Smith v. Ternullo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Smith v. Ternullo, 100 A.D.2d 525, 472 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals (1) from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Green, J.), dated September 20, 1982, as denied that branch of petitioner’s application which sought cancellation of a delinquency declaration and ordered a new final parole revocation hearing, and (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated June 27, 1983, as upon reargument, adhered to its original determination. U Appeals dismissed, without costs or disbursements. 11 The petitioner has been released on parole and, therefore, his liberty is no longer restrained to such a degree as to entitle him to the extraordinary writ of habeas corpus (People ex rel. Wilder v Markley, 26 NY2d 648). Titone, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. McBride v. Alexander
54 A.D.3d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People ex rel. Palumbo v. New York State Division of Parole
135 Misc. 2d 683 (New York Supreme Court, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.D.2d 525, 472 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-smith-v-ternullo-nyappdiv-1984.