People ex rel. Smith v. Ternullo

100 A.D.2d 525, 472 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17495
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 5, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals (1) from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Green, J.), dated September 20, 1982, as denied that branch of petitioner’s application which sought cancellation of a delinquency declaration and ordered a new final parole revocation hearing, and (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated June 27, 1983, as upon reargument, adhered to its original determination. U Appeals dismissed, without costs or disbursements. 11 The petitioner has been released on parole and, therefore, his liberty is no longer restrained to such a degree as to entitle him to the extraordinary writ of habeas corpus (People ex rel. Wilder v Markley, 26 NY2d 648). Titone, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Smith v. Ternullo, 100 A.D.2d 525, 472 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

100 A.D.2d 525 (People ex rel. Smith v. Ternullo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. McBride v. Alexander
54 A.D.3d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People ex rel. Palumbo v. New York State Division of Parole
135 Misc. 2d 683 (New York Supreme Court, 1987)