People ex rel. Smith v. Parker

246 A.D. 674

This text of 246 A.D. 674 (People ex rel. Smith v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Smith v. Parker, 246 A.D. 674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Appellant, a taxpayer in the town of Long Lake, Hamilton county, has petitioned for an order of certiorari directed to the assessors of the town, and to the water commissioners of Water District No. 2, located in that town, to review an assessment for the benefits arising because the lands assessed are located in the water district. The application as to the assessors has been granted but denied as to the water commissioners. The appeal is from the denial. The petition seeks in this proceeding to review the formation of the water district, and to question the benefit of the water supply to the petitioner. The petitioner has mistaken his remedy. (Town Law, § 195.) The law as to the assessment of benefits has already been considered and passed upon by the courts of this State. (Matter of Syracuse, B. & N. Y. R. R. Co. v. Van Amburgh, 223 App. Div. 485; affd., 251 N. Y. 548; People ex rel. D., L. & W. R. R. Co. v. Wildy, 262 id. 109.) Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Syracuse, Binghamton and New York v. Amburgh
168 N.E. 422 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
In re Syracuse, Binghamton & New York Railroad
223 A.D. 485 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-smith-v-parker-nyappdiv-1935.