People ex rel. Smith v. Myers

15 Cal. 33
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 15 Cal. 33 (People ex rel. Smith v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Smith v. Myers, 15 Cal. 33 (Cal. 1860).

Opinion

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Cope, J. and Field, C. J. concurring.

This was a bill filed in the District Court for the purpose of declaring void a contract made by the Board of Supervisors of Stanislaus county, for a court house, jail, etc.

A demurrer was interposed by the defendants. One of the grounds is, that the action was improperly brought in the name of the people. The demurrer was overruled, and «judgment for the plaintiffs. We are not at all convinced that, on the substantial merits of this case, the suit can be maintained, or that the county is not justly chargeable upon the contract set out. But we make it a rule not to decide cases in the absence of the parties who are beneficially and really interested, since that would be to allow a controversy to go on in the names and at the instances of parties who are not bound by the decision.

The people of the county are not a coporation, nor are they recognized in law as capable of suing or being sued. If any objection is taken, or can be taken, to this contract, it must be by the county, which is a corporation; or if the officers of the county exceed their powers, or are acting, or about to act, with gross injustice and bad faith to the tax-payers, and thereby subject them to unjust and unauthorized burdens, perhaps one or more of the tax-payers, thus burdened or threatened, might, under peculiar circumstances, invoke the remedial powers of a Court of Equity, to prevent irreparable injury. This case, however, presents no ground for relief, as it is presented by the record, in favor of the plaintiffs.

The demurrer was improperly overruled, and the judgment is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Harris v. Rizzo
214 Cal. App. 4th 921 (California Court of Appeal, 2013)
People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El Dorado
487 P.2d 1193 (California Supreme Court, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Cal. 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-smith-v-myers-cal-1860.