People ex rel. Smith v. Hoffman

32 Misc. 379, 66 N.Y.S. 2
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1900·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Giegerich, J.

The Governor unquestionably had the power to appoint the Board of Examination (Military Code, § 64), which [380] decided that the petitioner was unfit for service in the National Guard of the State of New York. The proceedings and report were approved by the Governor, the Commander-in-Chief of the National Guard, and thereupon, by operation of law, the petitioner was discharged from the service (Military Code, § 64). The proceedings did not, as claimed, partake of the character of a judicial inquiry, but were had in aid of the Commander-in-Chief, to enable him to understandingly exercise his discretion in determining the fitness of an officer to hold his commission. The approval by the Governor was a function which, under the law, was vested in him in connection with the State Military Department, and the proceedings generally related to the exercise of power by the executive, and are not subject to control by the judicial department. 8 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 1401. The motion is, therefore, granted.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Smith v. Hoffman, 32 Misc. 379, 66 N.Y.S. 2 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

32 Misc. 379 (People ex rel. Smith v. Hoffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Linden v. Solomacha
556 A.2d 346 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)
Kirk v. Kirk
120 A.2d 854 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Federal Labor Union 23393 v. American Can Co.
100 A.2d 693 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Pisciotta v. Buccino
91 A.2d 629 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
MacH. Printers, Etc., US v. Merrill, Etc., Works
78 A.2d 834 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)