People Ex Rel. Smith v. County Court

102 P.2d 476, 106 Colo. 95
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedApril 8, 1940
DocketNo. 14,753.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 102 P.2d 476 (People Ex Rel. Smith v. County Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People Ex Rel. Smith v. County Court, 102 P.2d 476, 106 Colo. 95 (Colo. 1940).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Young

delivered the opinion of the court.

The petitioner seeks the exercise of our original jurisdiction to prohibit the county court of Fremont county and Kent L. Eldred, as judge of said court, and the district court of the state of Colorado in and for the county of Fremont and James L. Cooper, judge thereof, from exercising any jurisdiction over the property of petitioner or over claims heretofore filed in a proceeding in *97 the county court, entitled “Matter of the Estate of Will H. Smith, Mental Incompetent,” other than to approve the final report of the conservatrix and to return petitioner’s property to him, he having been legally adjudicated a mental incompetent prior to said proceedings and subsequently adjudicated restored to mental competency and released.

July 29, 1939, petitioner was adjudicated mentally incompetent and a conservatrix appointed. A large number of claims were filed. Some were allowed and others disallowed. All of the allowed claims excepting two, which it is conceded are now judgments against petitioner, were withdrawn. These two claims in judgment require no consideration.

November 8, 1939, petitioner was legally adjudicated restored to mental competency and released. December 9, 1939, was fixed for the settlement of the accounts of the conservatrix of which due notice was given. On this date the hearing was continued to December 21, 1939, at which time, due to the illness of the county judge of Fremont county, Honorable Hubert Glover sat in his stead. The conservatrix presented her final report and prayed for discharge. Petitioner filed his written approval of said report together with a written request that the prayer of discharge be granted and that the conservatrix return to him all his money and property remaining in her hands. By said writing petitioner acknowledged his personal liability for and agreed to assume payment of all lawful claims in said matter. Prior to December 21, 1939, all expenses of administration in said matter had been settled and paid or withdrawn or waived in order that the conservatrix might then be discharged.

On December 21, 1939, certain claimants with unallowed claims asked that their claims be adjudicated prior to the discharge of the conservatrix. To the granting of this request conservatrix objected on the ground that the county court had no jurisdiction. and moved *98 that the said claims be dismissed without prejudice, which motion was denied, and one claim in excess of $2,000, herein referred to as the Hahn claim, was then-set for hearing on January 9, 1940. A second claim in the sum of approximately $600, designated herein as the Klein claim, was set for hearing on January 10, 1940. A third claim in a sum in excess of $3,000, herein mentioned as the Jenkins claim, was set for hearing on January 11,1940. All of the remaining unallowed claims were set for January 11, 1940, for resetting on said date. All of these settings were over the objection of the conservatrix on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. On this same date, December 21, 1939, and after the adjudication that petitioner was mentally competent, Judge Glover, sitting as aforesaid, entered an order prohibiting and restraining petitioner from in any manner interfering with said conservatrix in the performance of her duties or in the management or control of the estate, property, and affairs of petitioner.

On the dates set for the hearing thereof the claims of Hahn and Klein were allowed and the Jenkins claim, due to the illness of the claimant, was reset for January 30, 1940.

At this juncture petitioner applied to Honorable James L. Cooper, judge of the district court of Fremont county, for a writ of prohibition to restrain the said county court from proceeding further in the premises because of lack of its jurisdiction in the matter of the management and control of the petitioner and his property. An alternative writ issued and Judge Eldred, having recovered from his illness and resumed his duties, filed an answer to the writ admitting that his said court was without jurisdiction in the premises except to settle the accounts of the conservatrix and discharge her, and consenting that said writ of prohibition should issue if said district court should be so advised. After hearing, Judge Cooper refused to make the alternative writ permanent.

*99 January 22, 1940, following the action of the district court as aforesaid, the conservatrix moved the county court for an order nunc pro tunc as of December 21, 1939, approving her final report and discharging her as conservatrix. She also moved the court for an order vacating and holding for naught the orders allowing the Hahn and Klein claims and continuing the Jenkins claim for hearing on January 30. Conservatrix moved further for an order nunc pro tunc as of December 21, 1939, disallowing all other claims without prejudice to the rights of claimants to proceed against petitioner individually. Said motions were based upon the ground that the said county court had no jurisdiction in the premises excepting to settle the accounts of the conservatrix, and that its jurisdiction to do other than this ceased and terminated on November 8, 1939, the date of the adjudication of petitioner’s restoration to competency. The attorneys for the various claimants filed a motion for a change of judge alleging that Judge Eldred was disqualified because of his answer to the aforesaid writ of prohibition from the district court, in which he had stated that he had no jurisdiction in the premises other than as heretofore stated. The motion was granted and Honorable I. E. Jones, county judge of El Paso county, was called in to preside at the hearing of said motion and, January 30,1940, he denied the same on the ground that the questions involved had been passed upon by the court with Honorable Hubert Glover sitting as judge and that he, as a coordinate judge in the same court, had no power to overrule the decisions of. Judge Glover.

On February 7, 1940, Judge Eldred, of his own motion, examined the files and records of his court and made and entered an order therein wherein he found that the jurisdiction of the county court over petitioner and his property and affairs ceased and determined with the restoration of petitioner to mental competency November 8, 1939, except that the county court retained jurisdiction to settle the accounts of the conservatrix. *100 He further found that a final report of the conservatrix had been filed on December 21, 1939, that it had been approved in writing by petitioner, and it thereupon was ordered that the said report be approved; that the conservatrix turn over to petitioner the money and property of his estate remaining in her hands; and that upon so doing and filing a receipt therefor she be discharged. It was further ordered that all orders and proceedings in said matter entered and had since the 9th day of November, 1939, be vacated and held for naught. The order having been entered on the court’s own motion, it was provided that any objections thereto filed on or before the 13th day of February would be considered by the court, whereupon notice of the entry of the order was mailed to all parties in interest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Hayden
433 N.E.2d 1161 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1982)
Hoff v. Meirink
145 N.E.2d 58 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 P.2d 476, 106 Colo. 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-smith-v-county-court-colo-1940.