People ex rel. Smith v. Artus

92 N.E.3d 1247, 30 N.Y.3d 1090, 69 N.Y.S.3d 857
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors·Decided February 8, 2018·No. 2017–1146·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that relator has been released from respondent's custody and, therefore, he is not entitled to the extraordinary writ of habeas corpus (see People ex rel. Wilder v. Markley , 26 N.Y.2d 648, 307 N.Y.S.2d 672, 255 N.E.2d 784 [1970] ; see also People ex rel. Bourlaye T. v. Connolly , 25 N.Y.3d 1054, 12 N.Y.S.3d 17, 33 N.E.3d 1287 [2015] ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Smith v. Artus, 92 N.E.3d 1247, 30 N.Y.3d 1090, 69 N.Y.S.3d 857 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2018).

92 N.E.3d 1247 (People ex rel. Smith v. Artus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People Ex Rel. Bourlaye T. v. Connolly
33 N.E.3d 1287 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People ex rel. Wilder v. Markley
255 N.E.2d 784 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)