Home/Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors/People ex rel. Smith v. Artus

People ex rel. Smith v. Artus

92 N.E.3d 1247, 30 N.Y.3d 1090, 69 N.Y.S.3d 857
CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
DecidedFebruary 8, 2018
Docket2017–1146
StatusPublished

This text of 92 N.E.3d 1247 (People ex rel. Smith v. Artus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Smith v. Artus, 92 N.E.3d 1247, 30 N.Y.3d 1090, 69 N.Y.S.3d 857 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that relator has been released from respondent's custody and, therefore, he is not entitled to the extraordinary writ of habeas corpus (see People ex rel. Wilder v. Markley , 26 N.Y.2d 648, 307 N.Y.S.2d 672, 255 N.E.2d 784 [1970] ; see also People ex rel. Bourlaye T. v. Connolly , 25 N.Y.3d 1054, 12 N.Y.S.3d 17, 33 N.E.3d 1287 [2015] ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Bourlaye T. v. Connolly
33 N.E.3d 1287 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People ex rel. Wilder v. Markley
255 N.E.2d 784 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 N.E.3d 1247, 30 N.Y.3d 1090, 69 N.Y.S.3d 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-smith-v-artus-nycterr-2018.