People ex rel. Smiley v. La Vallee
This text of 16 A.D.2d 710 (People ex rel. Smiley v. La Vallee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order denying without a hearing a writ of habeas corpus. The relator-appellant contends that the original proceedings in the Magistrates’ Court were improperly adjourned and that the complainant was not sworn as a witness when testifying. The purpose of the adjournment was to afford the appellant an opportunity to procure counsel. He argues that the adjournment for two weeks, when he asked for one week, caused the Magistrates’ Court to lose jurisdiction. Subsequently the Grand Jury returned an indictment against the appellant for the crimes with which he was charged in the Magistrates’ Court. It is well-settled law that an indictment supersedes any and all prior proceedings. (People ex rel. HirsChberg v. Close, 1 N Y 2d 258, 261; People ex rel. Monroe v. La Vallee, 8 A D 2d 927; Matter of Morhous v. Supreme Ct., 293 N. Y. 131.) Order unanimously affirmed. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 A.D.2d 710, 226 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-smiley-v-la-vallee-nyappdiv-1962.