People ex rel. Smalls v. DeCiuceis

292 A.D.2d 552, 739 N.Y.S.2d 581, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3021

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), entered January 16, 2001, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed this habeas corpus proceeding, since it was not the appropriate vehicle for asserting the claims raised in the petition (see, People ex rel. Douglas v Vincent, 50 NY2d 901; People ex rel. Maldonado v Artuz, 267 AD2d 411; People ex rel. Smith v Hanslmaier, 237 AD2d 473; People ex rel. Benbow v Scully, 189 AD2d 844). Krausman, J.P., McGinity, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Smalls v. DeCiuceis, 292 A.D.2d 552, 739 N.Y.S.2d 581, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

292 A.D.2d 552 (People ex rel. Smalls v. DeCiuceis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Douglas v. Vincent
409 N.E.2d 990 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People ex rel. Benbow v. Scully
189 A.D.2d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People ex rel. Smith v. Hanslmaier
237 A.D.2d 473 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People ex rel. Maldonado v. Artuz
267 A.D.2d 411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)