People ex rel. Smalls v. DeCiuceis
This text of 292 A.D.2d 552 (People ex rel. Smalls v. DeCiuceis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), entered January 16, 2001, which dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly dismissed this habeas corpus proceeding, since it was not the appropriate vehicle for asserting the claims raised in the petition (see, People ex rel. Douglas v Vincent, 50 NY2d 901; People ex rel. Maldonado v Artuz, 267 AD2d 411; People ex rel. Smith v Hanslmaier, 237 AD2d 473; People ex rel. Benbow v Scully, 189 AD2d 844). Krausman, J.P., McGinity, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
292 A.D.2d 552, 739 N.Y.S.2d 581, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-smalls-v-deciuceis-nyappdiv-2002.