People ex rel. Sisco v. Board of Commissioners

New York Supreme Court

People ex rel. Sisco v. Board of Commissioners

30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 603

New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1881·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam :

We think this ease was correctly decided by the Special Term, and that the judgment should be affirmed substantially upon the opinion of Van Brunt, J.

We may add that we concur in the views expressed by Mr. Butler in the careful and judicious opinion furnished by him to the board prior to the commencement of the present proceedings.

Present — Davis, P. J., Brady and Barrett, JJ",

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

We think this ease was correctly decided by the Special Term, and that the judgment should be affirmed substantially upon the opinion of Van Brunt, J.

We may add that we concur in the views expressed by Mr. Butler in the careful and judicious opinion furnished by him to the board prior to the commencement of the present proceedings.

Present — Davis, P. J., Brady and Barrett, JJ",

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

People ex rel. Sisco v. Board of Commissioners, 30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 603 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).

Pincite

30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 603 (People ex rel. Sisco v. Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.