People ex rel. Simpson v. Greene

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Simpson v. Greene

18 A.D.3d 923, 793 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4889

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 18 A.D.3d 923 (People ex rel. Simpson v. Greene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Simpson v. Greene, 18 A.D.3d 923, 793 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

— Crew III, J.P.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Berke, J.), entered March 25, 2004 in Washington County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70 for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that he was improperly delivered to and detained by respondent because the documentation that purported to authorize the execution of his sentence was defective. Supreme Court dismissed the petition without a hearing and we affirm, albeit for reasons other than those expressed by Supreme Court.

In light of the information contained in the record, including documents entitled “sentence and commitment,” it is apparent that petitioner would not be entitled to immediate release even if he prevailed here and, hence, habeas corpus is not available to him (see People ex rel. Pilgrim v Greene, 16 AD3d 787, 788 [2005]). Accordingly, petitioner’s application was properly dismissed without a hearing.

Carpinello, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI