People Ex Rel. Simon v. . Darlington
85 N.E. 1114, 192 N.Y. 572, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 987
This text of 85 N.E. 1114 (People Ex Rel. Simon v. . Darlington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People Ex Rel. Simon v. . Darlington, 85 N.E. 1114, 192 N.Y. 572, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 987 (N.Y. 1908).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WERNER, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ.; VANN and WILLARD BARTLETT, JJ., dissent on the ground that the allegation in the writ that the relator was given no opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses against him was not denied in the return.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
85 N.E. 1114, 192 N.Y. 572, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-simon-v-darlington-ny-1908.