People ex rel. Sheehan v. Commissioner of New York City Department of Correction

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Sheehan v. Commissioner of New York City Department of Correction

19 A.D.3d 709, 797 N.Y.S.2d 297, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7314

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.3d 709 (People ex rel. Sheehan v. Commissioner of New York City Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Sheehan v. Commissioner of New York City Department of Correction, 19 A.D.3d 709, 797 N.Y.S.2d 297, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7314 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release the defendant on his own recognizance or, in the alternative, fixing bail, pending the sentencing of the defendant upon his conviction of the charges of assault in the third degree and possession of a weapon in the fourth degree in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under indictment No. 2886/04.

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Queens County, not

[710]*710to release the defendant on bail pending his sentencing was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release the defendant on his own recognizance or, in the alternative, fixing bail, pending the sentencing of the defendant upon his conviction of the charges of assault in the third degree and possession of a weapon in the fourth degree in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under indictment No. 2886/04.

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Queens County, not

[710]*710to release the defendant on bail pending his sentencing was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.3d 709, 797 N.Y.S.2d 297, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-sheehan-v-commissioner-of-new-york-city-department-of-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack