People ex rel. Second Ave. R. Co. v. Coleman
4 N.Y.S. 417, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 355
Opinion
An examination of the careful opinion written by the learned referee in this case renders it entirely unnecessary for the court to reiterate the arguments so well presented by him in support of the conclusion at which he has arrived. It is sufficient, therefore, for us to say that we adopt the views expressed by the referee, and for the reasons stated by him affirm the order appealed from. The order should be affirmed with costs and disbursements. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Second Ave. R. Co. v. Coleman, 4 N.Y.S. 417, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 355 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).
4 N.Y.S. 417 (People ex rel. Second Ave. R. Co. v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Washabaugh v. Washabaugh
404 A.2d 1027 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1979)
Gilroy v. Smith
5 N.Y.S. 784 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)