People ex rel. Schram v. Molina
This text of 220 A.D.3d 909 (People ex rel. Schram v. Molina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Molina |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 05347 |
| Decided on October 20, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on October 20, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
LARA J. GENOVESI
BARRY E. WARHIT
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.
2023-09388
v
Louis Molina, etc., respondent.
Twyla Carter, New York, NY (Luke Schram pro se of counsel), for petitioner.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Morgan J. Dennehy, and Marjeta Nikolovski of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Daquan Priester-King upon his own recognizance or, in the alternative, to set reasonable bail upon Kings County Indictment No. 74877/2022.
ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.The determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger , 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson , 48 NY2d 230).
CONNOLLY, J.P., GENOVESI, WARHIT and WAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Acting Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
220 A.D.3d 909, 196 N.Y.S.3d 573, 2023 NY Slip Op 05347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-schram-v-molina-nyappdiv-2023.