People ex rel. Schachter v. Kahn

241 A.D. 686
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order dismissing writ of habeas corpus and awarding custody of the infant to her father, in so far as appealed from, modified by ehminating the provisions thereof entitling Esther Schachter, the maternal grandmother, to the right of visitation and the right of custody, and the provision that the father shall inform the maternal grandmother of any change in residence of the infant, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. In habeas corpus proceedings brought by a maternal grandmother against the father of a child, in whose custody the child is, the court has no power to grant a right of visitation to a maternal grandmother where it appears that the father is a proper guardian of the child. (People ex rel. Prior v. Prior, 112 Misc. 208; Matter of McDevitt, 101 id. 588; People ex rel. Klee v. Klee, 202 App. Div. 592.) In People ex rel. Reid v. Cavanagh (236 App. Div. 759) the question was not raised and there were suggestions of consent. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Schachter v. Kahn, 241 A.D. 686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 686 (People ex rel. Schachter v. Kahn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Geri v. Fanto
79 Misc. 2d 947 (NYC Family Court, 1974)
Noll v. Noll
277 A.D.2d 286 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
Windell v. Bell
107 P.2d 708 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1940)
People ex rel. Marks v. Grenier
249 A.D. 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)