People ex rel. Saperstein v. District Attorney Suffolk County

290 A.D.2d 524, 736 N.Y.S.2d 277, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 666

This text of 290 A.D.2d 524 (People ex rel. Saperstein v. District Attorney Suffolk County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Saperstein v. District Attorney Suffolk County, 290 A.D.2d 524, 736 N.Y.S.2d 277, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Suffolk County Indictment No. 2339A-2001.

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

[525]*525The determination of the County Court, Suffolk County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499; see, People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230). Altman, J.P., Smith, S. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger
255 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson
397 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 A.D.2d 524, 736 N.Y.S.2d 277, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-saperstein-v-district-attorney-suffolk-county-nyappdiv-2002.