People ex rel. Safford v. Washburn

188 A.D. 951
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1919·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.and disbursements, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of any discretion. Held, that the provisions of section 2641 of the Code of Civil Procedure were not intended to limit the jurisdiction of the surrogate conferred generally by the preceding sections of chapter 18 of the Code, but to remove any doubt as to whether in a ease provided for in that section the surrogate would have jurisdiction. This intention we think is indicated by the note of the commissioners to that section. All concurred, except Hubbs,, J., who dissented upon the ground that the jurisdiction conferred upon the Surrogate’s Court by chapter 18 of the Code of Civil Procedure is expressly limited by section 2641 of that chapter to cases where the trust was created by the will of a resident of the State and that the Surrogate’s Court has no jurisdiction where the will was the will of a non-resident, unless the trust relates to real property situated within the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Safford v. Washburn, 188 A.D. 951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).

188 A.D. 951 (People ex rel. Safford v. Washburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Munn
168 Misc. 648 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)
In re the Estate of Yuill
109 Misc. 465 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1919)