People Ex Rel. Rutland Railroad v. State Tax Commission
154 N.E. 597, 243 N.Y. 543, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 809
Opinion
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. We do not consider what effect, if any, chapter 180 of the Laws of 1810 and chapter 257 of the Laws of 1824 might have upon the conclusion reached by us. The case was not tried upon the theory that either statute was material, nor is such a claim argued before us by the Attorney-General.
His cock, Ch. J., Carúozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People Ex Rel. Rutland Railroad v. State Tax Commission, 154 N.E. 597, 243 N.Y. 543, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 809 (N.Y. 1926).
154 N.E. 597 (People Ex Rel. Rutland Railroad v. State Tax Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maloney v. Hearst Hotels Corporation
8 N.E.2d 296 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
People ex rel. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Gilchrist
221 A.D. 19 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)