People Ex Rel. Rutland Railroad v. State Tax Commission

154 N.E. 597, 243 N.Y. 543, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 809
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 8, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 154 N.E. 597 (People Ex Rel. Rutland Railroad v. State Tax Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People Ex Rel. Rutland Railroad v. State Tax Commission, 154 N.E. 597, 243 N.Y. 543, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 809 (N.Y. 1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. We do not consider what effect, if any, chapter 180 of the Laws of 1810 and chapter 257 of the Laws of 1824 might have upon the conclusion reached by us. The case was not tried upon the theory that either statute was material, nor is such a claim argued before us by the Attorney-General.

His cock, Ch. J., Carúozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maloney v. Hearst Hotels Corporation
8 N.E.2d 296 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
People ex rel. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Gilchrist
221 A.D. 19 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 N.E. 597, 243 N.Y. 543, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rutland-railroad-v-state-tax-commission-ny-1926.