People Ex Rel. Rutland Railroad v. State Tax Commission
This text of 154 N.E. 597 (People Ex Rel. Rutland Railroad v. State Tax Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. We do not consider what effect, if any, chapter 180 of the Laws of 1810 and chapter 257 of the Laws of 1824 might have upon the conclusion reached by us. The case was not tried upon the theory that either statute was material, nor is such a claim argued before us by the Attorney-General.
His cock, Ch. J., Carúozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 N.E. 597, 243 N.Y. 543, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rutland-railroad-v-state-tax-commission-ny-1926.