People Ex Rel. Rusch v. Ford

2 N.E.2d 316, 363 Ill. 340
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 17, 1936
DocketNo. 22937. Writ dismissed.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 N.E.2d 316 (People Ex Rel. Rusch v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People Ex Rel. Rusch v. Ford, 2 N.E.2d 316, 363 Ill. 340 (Ill. 1936).

Opinions

Mr. Justice Farthing

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiff in error, William Ford, who was a judge of an election held in Chicago on November 8, 1932, was found guilty of contempt of court by the county court of Cook county. The proceedings were had pursuant to the statute (46 S. H. A. art. 2, sec. 13,) which provides for the summary punishment of misbehavior by judges and clerks of election. The judgment against the plaintiff in error was affirmed by the Appellate Court for the First District, and the cause is here on writ of error.

Our decision in People v. Kotwas, (ante, p. 336,) controls the question presented, and for the reason there stated the writ of error will be dismissed. . .

Writ dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Rusch v. Fusco
74 N.E.2d 531 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1947)
People ex rel. Rusch v. Kirgis
4 N.E.2d 894 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.E.2d 316, 363 Ill. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rusch-v-ford-ill-1936.