People ex rel. Ruppert v. Clement
This text of 139 A.D. 508 (People ex rel. Ruppert v. Clement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case presents the same point discussed and decided in People ex rel. Haffen Brewing Co. v. Clement (139 App. Div. 502), opinion handed down herewith, with this exception : Iii the case at bar the petition alleged that James Hogan, an employee of the certificate holder, was arrested on a charge of unlawfully; violating the provisions of said Liquor Tax Law and that said complaint was dismissed by the grand jury and a certificate of dismissal under the-seal of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace was attached: .Upon the authority of People ex rel. Fallert Brewing Co. v. Lyman (53 App. Div. 470 ; affd., 168 N. Y. 669) and People ex rel. Stevenson Co. v. Lyman (69 App. Div. 406) this action by the grand jury is equivalent to an acquittal.
The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten [509]*509dollars costs and disbursements, and a peremptory writ of mandamus granted, with ten dollars costs.
Ingraham, P. J.¡ Lahghlin, Scott and Miller; JJ., concurred.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 A.D. 508, 124 N.Y.S. 106, 1910 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-ruppert-v-clement-nyappdiv-1910.