People ex rel. Rothermel v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Rothermel v. Murphy

245 A.D. 783

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 245 A.D. 783 (People ex rel. Rothermel v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Rothermel v. Murphy, 245 A.D. 783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

The relator is now being held on the commitment of the Parole Board, following the violation of the terms imposed by the Governor who had granted commutation. The Board was without power to commit under the law as it then existed, sections 696, 697, 698, Code of Criminal Procedure. Order reversed and relator discharged. Hill, P. J., Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes and Bliss, JJ., dissent. (See People ex rel. Atkins v. Jennings, 248 N. Y. 46.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The relator is now being held on the commitment of the Parole Board, following the violation of the terms imposed by the Governor who had granted commutation. The Board was without power to commit under the law as it then existed, sections 696, 697, 698, Code of Criminal Procedure. Order reversed and relator discharged. Hill, P. J., Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes and Bliss, JJ., dissent. (See People ex rel. Atkins v. Jennings, 248 N. Y. 46.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D. 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rothermel-v-murphy-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack